Posted on

Big animals, high costs: is animal insurance worth it? but only sometimes

Big animals, high costs: is animal insurance worth it? but only sometimes

Anyone who has ever been to the vet as a pet owner with their fur or feather friend knows from their own painful experience how expensive a treatment can be. Even seemingly routine treatments can cost money. The solution can be animal insurance, although even veterinarians are of the opinion that this will only be worthwhile for large animals and the correspondingly high costs.

Early dog and cat insurance is important

Veterinarians know from their daily practical experience that the costs for a pet owner are higher the older the animals get. The reason: With age, chronic diseases often set in, which can be treated with great expenditure of time and money. In the meantime, many dog and cat owners have decided to have their animals insured, and there is a comparatively large selection of such providers. Most policyholders say they are satisfied with the insurance to their veterinarian. Tip: The earlier this is concluded, the cheaper it is. This applies, on the one hand, to the premiums and, on the other hand, to the obstacle to insuring chronically ill animals. The relevant data must be provided when carrying out the health inquiry before concluding the insurance contract. Older animals usually already have one or the other ailment, which must be listed here and which leads to the exclusion of insurance eligibility.

Big dogs cost a lot

It is well known that larger animals cost more than smaller ones. In principle, this applies to all animal species, but it can also be used within a species. A large dog costs more at the vet than a small one or a cat. It is not the examination itself that is more expensive, it is the medication that makes the difference. These are measured according to the body size or the weight of the animal. In terms of medication, a dog weighing 50 kg costs more than a dog weighing just ten kilograms. This also makes a difference with medication that you use regularly, such as worming agents. It is particularly noticeable, for example, in the case of protracted therapy for inflammation or cancer; chronic diseases such as osteoarthritis can also cost money. At the same time, large dogs are more prone to many ailments, examples being osteoarthritis and hip dysplasia. They put heavier loads on their bones and joints, which means that symptoms of wear and tear and inflammation appear earlier.

Would you rather take out insurance?

Veterinarians are often confronted with the fact that the pet owners are not solvent. You put bills on hold or ask for a possible installment if the examination turns out to be more expensive than expected. In order to be protected against payment default, veterinarians advise you to take out animal insurance. Have better than need! That is probably the motto. However, such an insurance also costs a lot of money, with the amount of the premiums depending on the desired services. A pure operating theater insurance costs less than a complete health insurance for the animal, even if regular examinations, vaccinations and deworming should be included. Nice for the animal, annoying for the owner: If the insurance is not needed, the money is gone. It will not be paid out again if the insurance company did not have to be used.

Conclusion: take out animal insurance based on animal size and financial status

Anyone who can afford to financially cope with a major, unplanned treatment of dog or cat, certainly does not need animal insurance. It is paid into this as long as the animal lives. If he stays healthy until his death, the insurance benefits will never be used and the premiums have been paid unnecessarily. However, if you want to be fully covered and want to ensure that the animal receives the best and most comprehensive treatment in an emergency, you should take out animal insurance. This is particularly recommended for animals that are very large, because they not only cost significantly more in terms of maintenance, but also in terms of veterinary services than small representatives of their species.

divide

Find animal insurance

Compare all providers in Switzerland quickly and free of charge.

Compare all providers

These articles might also interest you:

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Imprint - data protection declaration

Posted on

Cyber insurance for companies: only to be taken out against proof?

Cyber insurance for companies: only to be taken out against proof?

Humans are considered to be the greatest weak point and are not infrequently the reason why criminals can even break into a network. Cyber insurance should cover the most important risks. Now the first providers are thinking about offering this insurance only if the company can provide evidence of training on cybersecurity.

Human weakness: The greatest gateway for criminals is the user himself

Often it is a question of the fact that a network or a computer is supposedly not secure enough. But technology is rarely to blame for hacker attacks! Usually it is the person who sits in front of the computer who opens the door to the criminals. Passwords that are particularly easy to crack are a common problem, another is confirmed confirmations that lead to fake pages. Especially now that many people are sitting in the home office instead of in the office, companies are increasingly exposed to attacks by cyber criminals. Safety regulations are apparently less well observed at home.
The consequences can be serious: loss of reputation and damage to the image of customers and business partners, financial losses due to unauthorized bookings and the paralyzing of an entire company with the problem of ransom payments being resolved are just three examples of this.

Training of employees as the most important measure

In order to protect companies from attacks by cyber criminals, employee training is important. You need to know how the IT system works and what protective measures are possible. At the same time, they should know any weak points so that they can pay particular attention to them. It should be clear that a firewall is important because there is no need to invest a lot of money in back-up software if the firewall is left open. Infiltration of the system is then only a matter of time and could have been prevented by simple means. If these means are known! It is not for nothing that more and more cyber insurance providers are trying to protect themselves against ignorance. You now only want to offer insurance if the company making the request provides evidence that the employees have participated in appropriate safety training.

However, two thirds of Swiss companies cannot provide such training and therefore have to live with the fact that the company is repeatedly attacked by hackers. However, awareness training is important so that employees know what is important and what are the signs of a possible attack. You also need to know where the limits are and when they are all important, because you are the only one standing between the company and the attacking person. In training courses, it must therefore become clear which goals possible attackers are pursuing and how the individual cases must be reacted to. It should also be explained that attack strategies can change and that criminals are becoming more and more brilliant at concocting new attack scenarios.

Conclusion: Cyber insurance only as a supplement to training

There is no question that cyber insurance is important in order to prevent or regulate damage to the company from hackers. But employee training is just as important. Leading providers of such insurance provide that insurance is no longer possible without training or that only very expensive insurance solutions are offered. In the meantime, a company that does not offer any training courses can no longer take out cyber insurance. It is therefore in the interest of all parties involved to conduct appropriate training and thus protect the company as best as possible (also in terms of insurance).

divide

Insurance for SMEs

Compare all providers in Switzerland quickly and free of charge.

Compare all providers

These articles might also interest you:

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Imprint - data protection declaration

Posted on

Innovative start-ups: Established companies learn from newcomers

Innovative start-ups: Established companies learn from newcomers

Start-ups keep popping up like mushrooms. Many of them disappear again, but some with their ideas prevail on the market. Even established companies can still learn a lot from these founders, because it is not uncommon for ideas and approaches to be recognized here that have what it takes to change the world.

Characteristics of good ideas

A good idea is not necessarily only characterized by the fact that it seems easy to implement and that it meets a willing market. There are other characteristics that can be used to identify a good business idea. Very important: the idea takes advantage of a trend. This must not be fully developed, but should rather be in the making. The team that wants to implement the idea must be innovative and should have the ability to turn an idea into a product. It is interesting that an absolutely unique position in the market can even be negative. Because: where there is no competition, there is usually no market. A complete niche product or a super special service does not necessarily have to be good!

In addition, founders of start-ups usually have the necessary motivation to really want to implement their idea. They put everything on one card and bring time and money with them, although they often don't have enough of both. Failures are common, setbacks are normal. They have to be accepted and make the founder stronger. They point out weaknesses that need to be improved and show what cannot work in which way.
In addition, good ideas are spread through networks that are not held together by money. While a certain income or a market position is often decisive for being accepted into a network in established companies, this is not yet the case with start-ups. Shared values and belief in the idea are much more important here. Exchanging ideas with others can maximize profits and reveal mistakes that the founder himself does not see.

The hunger for success must remain

Too quick success can be counterproductive. If a team makes profits too quickly and can place the product directly, the hunger for success often diminishes. Mistakes are made and tolerated, the will to improve something no longer exists. At the same time, the ability to change strategy is lost. If you want to be successful, you have to adapt, and that includes constantly rethinking your own strategy. Especially in the early phase, when there is little money available, the strategy has to be repeatedly adapted to the current circumstances, which sometimes seems quite difficult. Anyone who tries anyway will be rewarded with success. This in turn keeps the sense for new attempts and experiments. At the same time, the vision remains to offer customers something unique and simply to be better than others.
Important skills that a founder brings and that are important for a well-established company can therefore be the following:

    • Ability to adapt is retained
    • agile thinking is present
    • Strategies are adjusted
    • the unconditional will to succeed remains
    • Data evaluations and analyzes are used to find new ways
    • Team remains independent and still uses the skills from the network

Conclusion: Established companies learn a lot from start-ups about the right attitude

Many established companies look down on startups from above. Nevertheless, the founders have some skills that can be of benefit to long-established companies and that allow them to advance further on the ladder of success. Networks should not only be created and used according to status, but above all take personal components into account. The absolute will to succeed must remain, and no one should be discouraged by setbacks. Rather, it is important to adapt and find new ways instead of sticking to the old one. Even if the start-up idea may fail, it still provides valuable information for other companies.

divide

Insurance for SMEs

Compare all providers in Switzerland quickly and free of charge.

Compare all providers

These articles might also interest you:

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Imprint - data protection declaration

Posted on

Expensive personal loans as a savior in an emergency: Better look for other help!

Expensive personal loans as a savior in an emergency: Better look for other help!

Thanks to the corona pandemic, more Swiss than ever are dependent on additional financial help. A big problem could be taxes that are not affordable, especially since tax debts are the most common debt in Switzerland. Only then do debts follow through bills or unpaid health insurance contributions. Many Swiss are looking for their salvation in a personal loan that is supposed to help them out of financial misery. But most of the time it just makes things worse.

Personal loan leads into the debt trap

The calculation is simple: the current income is not enough to pay rent, bills, health insurance premiums and then also the taxes. A small loan should be the salvation and first of all allows the payment of all outstanding liabilities. But the regular income is no longer and the previous liabilities usually arise again. After all, these are mostly payments that have to be made continuously at certain intervals. In addition, there are now the repayment installments for the personal loan, which can sometimes start with a repayment-free period, but the interest payments are still due during this period. The result: The person concerned goes into debt even more and gets deeper and deeper into the debt trap, from which he can often no longer free himself. Debt counseling often only leads to the conclusion that personal bankruptcy is inevitable.

Look for alternatives to personal loans

Before going to the bank or credit broker, alternatives should first be considered. One possibility is to arrange a deferral of the payment with the payment partner. The payment term can possibly be pushed back so that the liabilities can be processed according to their prioritization. This also applies to the tax office, which can receive a justified request for payment in installments. If there are already debts, it is possible that the tax office will not approve a deferral. It is therefore important to act in good time and to submit a corresponding application as soon as the first impending debt arises.

Mail order companies or local sellers should also be asked to postpone payments. Often a payment-free period can be agreed or a supplier credit is taken out. Interest may then have to be paid on the invoice amount, but this is usually lower than interest at the bank when a personal loan has to be taken out.

Foundations also help in some cases. One example is Educa Swiss, a foundation that helps students in need. It grants loans to students, whereby particularly favorable conditions can be agreed. Crowddonating platforms may also come into question, although these will hardly be the right place to go if it's just a matter of paying a few bills. However, if your own education or that of your children is at stake, if your studies can no longer be financed, or if you are threatened with being kicked out of your home, such foundations can be your last resort.

Conclusion: choose personal loans only as an emergency solution

Those who get into financial hardship usually only have to bridge a certain period of scarcity. In addition, it is rarely about large sums, usually only a few hundred to thousand francs are needed to pay current bills, tax debts or health insurance premiums. A personal loan is then the worst possible solution, because it usually ensures the accumulation of an even larger mountain of debt. The bad conditions that are given on small amounts are to blame. The interest rates are high and cannot be compared with the interest rates that are common on a home loan, for example. In the end, the debtor is faced with a mountain of debts and needs a new solution, which often enough is personal bankruptcy. If you want to avoid this, you should definitely seek deferrals, deferred payments and possible subsidies from third parties.

divide

Credit comparison Switzerland

Calculate credit and compare all providers

Compare all loan providers now

These articles might also interest you:

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Imprint - data protection declaration

Posted on

Private liability insurance: is coverage of five million sufficient?

Private liability insurance: is coverage of five million sufficient?

It is clear that private liability insurance must be available and does not need to be discussed. Damage happens too quickly and should not be paid for out of pocket if possible. Especially since the polluter is fully liable for any damage and that with all of his private assets and, if necessary, for life. But not only the question of whether a liability insurance has to be available is important, but also how much it should be taken out.

High sums possible in insurance cases

If someone drops the neighbour's good camera on the ground at the garden party, that's a case for liability insurance. It takes over the damage and regulates it, whereby the amount of damage here is usually in the hundreds to low thousands. But what if a person is harmed? For example, does the postman slip on the way to the agreed storage location on the property, break his leg in a complicated way and fall out for months? A personal injury with the following financial loss due to the loss of earnings does not go into the four-digit range. The costs for the actual treatment are very high, loss of earnings must be paid and damages may have to be paid. In addition, follow-up costs can arise for many years to come. Such costs are not only unpredictable, but also at a level that a normal citizen can hardly raise from his savings. Private liability insurance pays for such damage. But this in turn only up to the agreed coverage level, which is usually between three and ten million francs. Most insurers offer coverage levels of three, five or ten million francs, only in some cases individual amounts need to be agreed in between.

This is how high the amounts insured should be

Even if really high sums of damage are rare, they do happen. Does it hit someone liable, doesn't it help that the sums of money are rarely high? he has to pay and maybe get into debt for life because his insurance does not have sufficient cover. So would you prefer to agree on a very high coverage and thus be completely covered? This is also unnecessary, because excessively high coverage also entails very high premiums.

It is therefore important to weigh up the risk and then determine the coverage levels. These are some of the questions that need to be addressed when making an initial assessment of the correct coverage:

    • What kind of activity can I do a lot of damage?
    • Am i a homeowner?
    • Do I rent residential, commercial or storage space?
    • Are strangers out and about on my property?
    • Do I have children who can cause harm?
    • Am I doing a sport that can harm others?

These questions are only to be seen as examples and can be individually adapted and expanded. It is important to clarify the personal basic needs. Pensioners who live alone in their house have a significantly lower liability risk than a family with three children in an apartment building. In addition, personal security needs should be taken into account. If you only feel comfortable when every eventuality is covered, should you pay higher premiums and benefit from being completely covered in every situation? even if this will never happen. Experts call this risk aversion, meaning the rejection of any risk.
In any case, it is important to clarify any disclaimers of liability before concluding the contract, because these can also be agreed.

Conclusion: Ten million is sufficient as coverage

Anyone wondering how high the coverage in the liability insurance should be, can assume that with a sum of ten million francs, both personal injury and financial loss are adequately covered. Depending on the individual risk, which should be clarified before concluding the insurance contract, a lower sum may be sufficient. It is usually possible to arrange coverage of three, five or ten million francs. Important: If the sum insured is insufficient, the person who caused the damage is liable with his private assets for the additional costs.

divide

Find household and personal liability insurance

Compare all providers in Switzerland quickly and free of charge.

Compare all providers

These articles might also interest you:

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Imprint - data protection declaration

Posted on

Supplementary insurance: Children need this coverage

Supplementary insurance: Children need this coverage

Parents want their children to be well protected. In return, it is not uncommon for them to be persuaded to take out additional insurance that they allegedly need. On closer inspection, however, it becomes clear that there was nothing here except expenses? is because the additional insurance in question was completely unnecessary for the child. Therefore, in the interest of not having to constantly empty your wallet, parents would do well to look at the various supplementary insurances in advance and only choose the insurance companies that are necessary.

Do you need several additional insurance policies?

Under no circumstances do children need several supplementary insurances, because the insurance packages of the providers are put together in such a way that all important insured events are included. Nevertheless, it does happen that parents have several supplementary insurance policies for their child or children. This is the case, for example, if a new insurance is applied for, but the old one has not yet been canceled. Dubious brokers are mostly to blame here, because they have usually recommended taking out additional insurance at an early stage. But the other way around, it can also be the case that you wait too long to take out a new contract and suddenly the child is left without any additional insurance. Illnesses not mentioned can also result in the supplementary insurance being terminated by the provider. Serious advice is therefore the first step.

Children really need this supplementary insurance

Unfortunately, it is a fact that many children need orthodontic treatment. The second teeth come in the second row behind the first? The child's jaw is not yet big enough and does not have space for the much wider second teeth? In view of the very high costs of orthodontics, an appropriate supplementary insurance for children makes sense so that a treatment does not have to fail due to finances. But be careful: some providers have age limits and no longer accept children from a certain age. This is then only possible if a doctor's certificate is presented and treatment is necessary because, for example, chewing is impaired. A pure beauty treatment, because the teeth are not in a row, is then no longer carried out and has to be financed out of pocket.

tip: Some providers rule out known misalignments and jaw problems. You then agree on a so-called individual performance reservation or you no longer pay for the treatment in individual cases.

Get alternative medicine insured

Many parents are skeptical about conventional medicine or generally want to use the possibilities of complementary medicine. Only a few alternative medicine treatment methods are included in basic insurance. In some cases, treatments with acupuncture or traditional homeopathic remedies are taken over. Everything that goes beyond this and causes costs must be paid for by the child's parents themselves. This also applies if the treatment is not carried out by a licensed doctor, but rather if the parents and their child go to a naturopath. If you want to use the gentler, alternative medicine, you should take out appropriate additional insurance.

Get private insurance right away?

Private health insurance may have many advantages, but it is also very expensive. Parents should bear in mind, on the one hand, that children are no longer accepted into various private health insurances with increasing age, which applies at the latest when certain previous illnesses become apparent. On the other hand, staying in a private room in a hospital, for example, is often counterproductive for children. They also need social contacts to get well and there are already numerous experts who are of the opinion that children in shared rooms recover faster. This means that only certain services should be covered by private insurance, but in most cases this is not really necessary.

Conclusion: hardly any additional insurance is necessary for children

For children, only two options are required as additional insurance: on the one hand, orthodontic treatment, on the other hand, alternative medicine. The latter is only important if the child's parents want to go to a naturopath in addition to conventional medicine or as the first point of contact and there are costs that are not covered by normal health insurance. In the case of supplementary insurance for children, the following applies: Less is more!

Compare all health insurance companies now

divide

Compare health insurance companies

Compare all health insurance companies quickly and free of charge.

Compare health insurance companies

These articles might also interest you:

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Imprint - data protection declaration

Posted on

Pension funds: the first point of contact for a mortgage

Pension funds: the first point of contact for a mortgage

The mortgage market is hotly contested and there are always special offers. However, these offers from the mortgage banks cannot beat those from the pension funds. It so happens that in the first half of 2021 over a quarter of the mortgage volume was brokered through the pension funds.

Thanks to good conditions, pension funds are growing significantly

For many Swiss people, pension funds are now the first point of contact when it comes to a mortgage loan. In the meantime, the pension funds have achieved a share of more than 25 percent of the total mortgage volume. In view of the predominantly very low interest rates (current interest rate for the majority of pension funds is below one percent), it is not surprising. Banks don't even get half of that low interest rate. At the same time, the pension funds offer a customer-friendly term. Longer mortgage terms are almost exclusively offered here. These are usually ten years or more.

This makes it clear: Even if the banks are still the top dogs and more than three-quarters of all mortgages are provided in Switzerland, the pension funds are still growing proportionally. Mortgages can only be taken out with pension funds via appropriate brokerage platforms, through which own products could also be brought onto the market. If you want to buy a house now, you can benefit from the good conditions of the pension funds.

Conditions that nobody else has?

Pension funds seem to know how to assert themselves in the market and not only with the above-mentioned conditions, which are extremely cheap. They even have offers in their program that no bank can compete with, because these offers simply do not exist on the bank side. In some cases, it is possible to terminate the mortgage prematurely and not have to accept any penalty payment. This is unthinkable with banks, because they get the interest loss back by early redemption through such a penalty payment. Many bank customers therefore prefer to think again whether the replacement is really worthwhile or whether any possible savings will not be eaten up by the penalty payment. The pension funds, on the other hand, offer free exit, which is a great advantage for customers.

The mortgage business is still profitable for pension funds, as they can make numerous investments with the money available. The mortgage is even more lucrative for them than safe government bonds, and the risk with mortgages is even lower than with real estate. The pension funds are now investing around three to five percent of their capital in mortgages. That doesn't sound like much at first. On closer inspection, however, it is a lot of money, because up to a billion francs are invested here.

Conclusion: prefer to take out mortgages with a pension fund

For example, if you want to take out a mortgage to build a house or buy a property, you should definitely look at the conditions of the pension funds when comparing loans. These are extremely cheap and can only be compared with a few banks. The reason is, on the one hand, the low interest rates, which are usually below one percent. On the other hand, the terms are very long to be agreed, which offers a high degree of security, especially in view of such a high sum as is required for real estate construction. It is also possible to arrange for the mortgage to be redeemed early without paying a fine, which is not the case with all pension funds. If something like this is envisaged, the mortgage partner should be assessed accordingly before the contract is concluded.

divide

Find the best mortgage

Compare all providers in Switzerland quickly and free of charge.

Compare all providers

These articles might also interest you:

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Imprint - data protection declaration

Posted on

Term life insurance: men have to pay more

Term life insurance: men have to pay more

Many people take out term life insurance so that their loved ones are covered in the event of their death. This applies, for example, to mortgages and building loans, which are agreed in large amounts. With the death of the insured person, the liabilities are settled. However, there are enormous differences in price for these insurance policies: men have to dig deeper into their pockets than women, and smokers pay more than non-smokers.

Men pay around a third more

Life insurance can cost male policyholders dearly. According to comparisons, they pay around a third more than women with the same age and marital status. Insurance companies justify this with a higher risk of death for men, who are known to have a lower life expectancy. The insurance providers act differently here, however, many want to position themselves equally towards men and women and do not adjust the premiums to gender-specific risks. In general, however, more women can be attracted by a low insurance premium, because they often compare in more detail than men.

Smokers also have to pay more

The difference becomes even clearer when the premiums for smokers and non-smokers are compared. It is also true for smokers that they have a significantly higher risk of death than non-smokers. At the same time, they may be unable to work due to lung cancer, for example, and no longer be able to pay the life insurance premiums. Insurers prevent this with higher premiums and thus protect themselves against the risk of payment default. Ultimately, smokers have to pay around 80 percent more premiums than non-smokers. Here there is also the difference between the sexes: men who smoke have to pay up to 80 percent more than non-smokers, while women who smoke pay around 60 percent more than non-smokers.

Big differences in insurance

The providers of term life insurance are very different and the premiums are sometimes up to 100 percent higher than with the cheapest providers, assuming the same conditions. Differences can exist simply because of age and weight, because related questions must be answered before the contract is concluded. It is noticeable that the life insurances, in which the sum insured decreases in the course of the contract period, are cheaper. Such insurance can be taken out, for example, when a building loan is taken out. The term life insurance secures the loan. This is repaid regularly, so the sum insured can also decrease to the same extent. However, an insurance with a constant sum is more than half to almost 90 percent more expensive compared to the insurance industry with a decreasing sum insured.

Conclusion: Only take out term life insurance after a comprehensive comparison

There is hardly any other insurance that needs to be compared as closely as term life insurance in order to ensure the lowest possible premiums. A young, healthy policyholder who does not smoke, is not overweight and takes out insurance with a decreasing sum insured will therefore be offered the best conditions. It is important to check the insurance contract carefully before signing it so that it really offers the desired protection for the bereaved. In addition, nothing should be insured unnecessarily, because each component also costs more money.

divide

Find life insurance

Compare all providers in Switzerland quickly and free of charge.

Compare all providers

These articles might also interest you:

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Imprint - data protection declaration

Posted on

Health insurance: Many want to change, few dare

Health insurance: Many want to change, few dare

The current "Health Insurance Study Switzerland", which was carried out by the consulting firm Accenture and the LINK Institute in March 2021, states that around two thirds of the Swiss want to change their health insurance. But only 6.8 percent actually dare to take this step.

The will is there, actions do not follow

In March 2021, the consulting firm Accenture had 1,052 Swiss people surveyed and wanted to find out how many people could currently imagine changing their health insurance. The respondents came from all age groups and linguistic regions in Switzerland. According to their own statements, two out of three people surveyed can imagine changing health insurance. You would even consider separating health and supplementary insurance and thus be insured with different providers. A quarter of those questioned had actually already taken this step before and had separated the two types of insurance. It is therefore no longer common practice to have both basic and supplementary insurance with the same provider.

When asked where the respective recommendation for the current health insurance came from, 43 percent of the respondents said that they had received the recommendation from family and friends. According to this, only 15.9 percent switch to a price comparison portal in accordance with the recommendations, and even fewer are those who switched to a specific health insurance company because of the recommendations by the insurance advisor or the employer or because of advertising. The changes themselves were noticeably frequent to Helsana and CSS, which were chosen by 47 percent of those who changed on January 1, 2021.

Only 6.8 percent of those questioned had actually made a change. Most people would like to switch, but shy away from the effort involved. Maybe it's a missed deadline or a certain convenience. Exactly what reasons are responsible for the low number of bills of exchange could not be answered in the course of the survey.

Insurers do not use potential

Experts assume that health insurers are not making use of the existing switch potential. Sales are particularly important here, as they have to recognize which customers want to switch. They have to be offered a product that is precisely tailored to them in order not to make the switch. In view of the low switching rates, however, the insurers may shy away from the higher expense because not so many insured people switch to other providers anyway. Nevertheless, the big task for sales should be to conduct better analyzes in order to find customers willing to switch. Because at some point there will also be a slight fluctuation!

The surveys made it clear that it was primarily the financial side that made the decision to switch. Around 67 percent of those surveyed stated that a higher price for the insurance product they selected was the most important reason they wanted to switch. In contrast, only 18 percent were responsible for the product itself or the service offered, which was classified as inadequate. If you want to change, you usually rely on the recommendations of relatives and friends. So it is not about the statements of the advertising, but actual experiences of known people from their own environment are believed.

Conclusion: where there is a will, there no change?

Even if a large number of respondents in this study stated that they would like to change health insurers, not even ten percent of people make this change. The respondents are representative of all Swiss, for whom it can be assumed that the situation with regard to the change is similar. The few insured persons who actually switch have switched to another insurance provider, mainly due to the price development of the insurance premiums. Here it is therefore important for the provider to use analyzes to make reliable statements about ways to retain the insured.

Compare all health insurance companies now

divide

Compare health insurance companies

Compare all health insurance companies quickly and free of charge.

Compare health insurance companies

These articles might also interest you:

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Imprint - data protection declaration

Posted on

snake: Play & Win

neoSnake: THE GAME

The motivation to integrate neoSnake in the neotralo app was very simple: Millions of Swiss commute to work every day. Some read 20min and others play. So why not be properly rewarded while gaming? Everyone in Switzerland has at least one health insurance company. Imagine you achieve a high score of 170 and neotralo pays your next health insurance premium. Doesn't that sound great?

How to play neoSnake:

    1. Download the neotralo app: neotralo.app
    2. Register and login
    3. Start neoSnake Game (You can start the game by tapping the neotralo logo 8 times within 2 seconds:

Prices

Highscore Preis Bemerkung
175
CHF 20 digitec voucher (available soon)
Each player can only win once. You must be at least 18 years old.
225
CHF 50 digitec voucher (available soon)
Each player can only win once. You must be at least 18 years old.
245
We will pay your next health insurance premium (available soon)
Each player can only win once. You must be at least 18 years old.

About neoSnake

Snake is a game in which a snake moving straight or at right angles is steered through a playing field. The aim of the game is to find the randomly appearing? Bites? and avoid obstacles, including one's own snake body. While the queue grows with every bite, maneuvering becomes more and more difficult as the playing field becomes increasingly full and the basic rate is faster.

  1.  

Snake (original)

The first known personal computer version with the title? Worm? was programmed in 1978 by Peter Trefonas from the USA on the TRS-80.

  1.  

divide

These articles might also interest you:

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Imprint - data protection declaration